You opine "...which would amend the Divorce Act to automatically award, regardless of history, "equal parenting" to warring couples."
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Antonia Zerbisias blames everything on Harper and deranged Men
The Zerb is at it again over at the Trawna Red Star and has
some of her usual bevy of Marxist supporters lining up to castigate all
males and try to suggest shared parenting is a conspiracy of the
religious right, men are too abusive to have shared custody etc. It's
the same old BS. The Zerb is a bitter and extreme Marxist Feminist who
rages on about her plight while denigrating all males and any one not in
keeping with her own very askew view of the universe.
I left the below comment among
others on the site. To the left you can view her gift for the written
word as a columnist and blogger for the Toronto Star.
I have read, digested, fermented and comprehended your rant
for today. I guess there are extreme groups on both sides of the gender
war but you most certainly comprise leadership of a very bitter
feminist, very far left extreme.You rely on blogs by retired
Grandmothers for your info. She did move left and she is a kindly
grandmother just afraid of phantom religiosity as you are.
You have supporters who are bitter over the hill male feminists
who use the same cherry picked disingenuous forms of discourse. How
can you ever expect respect as a person of credible insight by writing
in such a manner. The joint custody you speak of is a legal fiction.
Over 90% of physical custody in Canada goes to moms. Eight percent to
dads.
Some of your
supporters are very misinformed on the Australian reviews. The main
report was completed as follows: It appears common sense may prevail in
Australia given the Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) have
researched and found some non-partisan, non-ideological factors in
favour of shared parenting. They have indicated they have found no
correlation between violence and shared parenting, there has been a 22%
reduction in court cases, and the practice of shared parenting is widely
supported. The review, spread over two years involved 28,000 people,
including 15,000 parents and for most people it worked well. It shows
80 per cent of parents are co-operating.
The Zerb, in the
picture at right, doesn't do women any favours with her rants. She is a
self styled victim oriented feminist who lets her emotions run rampant
over logic, fairness, good research and most of all common sense.
Remember the old stereotype of women being too emotional to hold down
certain occupations. This person does that no favours. The bromide,
however, is just that in the same way men are too violent to share
custody of children. It is way past time to move past these phony
cliches and work cooperatively toward children's best interests which
includes two parents in their lives after divorce just as it was before
hand.
Much of what she
has stated is cherry picked so you go away with a wrong impression such
as joint custody.
She states:
"It should come as no surprise that the more extreme
elements of the "Men's Rights" movement are big fans of Prime Minister
Stephen Harper."
Not necessarily AZ. Harper's party is supposed to be the party
of family values but they have not yet done anything dealing with
reform of the Divorce act. It has been left to one member to sponsor a
bill that their Justice Minister, Nicholson, says does not have his
support. The only party leader who has stated in writing he supports
shared Parenting is Iggy in one of his books. Iggy, however, has
changed his tune on torture which he supported so he could change his
mind on shared parenting.
After all, the more
fanatical Men's Rights Activists (MRAs) – those who keep angry blogs,
send me vicious emails, denigrate "radical feminists," and act as if
women get a better deal in life – have much in common with the TheoCons
in Harper's caucus and inner circle.
Its clear the Zerb is not having a good day while writing this
but you will notice the anti-Harper crowd throw logic to the wind when
they rant on. Everything becomes Harper's fault, including global
warming, and they often forget what it was they were arguing against to
start with.
Which would explain why
Pastor Maurice Vellacott of Saskatoon-Wanuskewin, past chair of the
Pro-Life Caucus, proponent of spurious research on women's health,
creationist and agitator against same-sex rights, could get away with
introducing Bill C-422, which would amend the Divorce Act to
automatically award, regardless of history, "equal parenting" to
warring couples.
Note the ad hominem attacks on the man sponsoring the bill.
Rather than deal with the substance of the legislation attack the
person to see if anything sticks. Its the same approach with Harper.
Sorry Zerby there is no automatic awarding of children. Shared Parenting
in C-422 has a rebuttal presumption for "fit" parents. If
allegations are made they will be investigated and the judge will
decide. We will also try to get in place sanctions for those who make
false allegations.
Note that,
just because Harper's prorogation of Parliament killed 37 bills
midstream, the private members' bills didn't die. They live on until
they are passed – just as Conservative MP Candy Hoeppner's bill to
scrap the long gun registry did last fall – or until they are voted off
the island. MRAs love Vellacott's bill because, if they're as
seriously deranged as some seem to be, they can continue to exercise
control over their ex-wives and children.
She is really messed up probably by recent attacks on her in
the blogosphere, this one included, over her idiotic Tweet above and is
probably causing her lack of sleep. Hopefully she is not a mother but I
do pity her partner if she still has one. These rants are clearly
causing her some emotional grief. She is resorting to some "hot button"
words like "seriously deranged" but she must not be looking into the
mirror. Its appropriately amusing someone like this actually can get
paid by Canada's largest circulation daily for this utter nonsense.
You opine "...which would amend the Divorce Act to automatically award, regardless of history, "equal parenting" to warring couples."
You opine "...which would amend the Divorce Act to automatically award, regardless of history, "equal parenting" to warring couples."
You have
done your usual emotional over logic analysis of PMB C-422 by
attacking the bill's sponsor without actually understanding the
legislation. The bill proposes no such thing. There is a rebuttal
presumption for "fit" parents. If someone is found through thorough
investigation to be unfit the judge will rule accordingly. The unfit
parent could be of either gender.
For the rest you can go to the link below:
http://www.thestar.com/living/article/759534--men-s-rights-activists-drive-harper-s-policies#article
For a rebuttal
on her references to The Interim go here:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment